A New Environmental Delicacy?

Dr. Mark Post, of Maastricht University in the Netherlands, has successfully created a 5 ounce hamburger using muscle tissue cultures taken from cows in a slaughterhouse. This “in-vitro” meat required the creation of several billion cells and will be presented at a London event in a few weeks.

Taste-tests reveal the meat to be reasonably palatable. However, the burger was exceedingly expensive to create, costing $350,000. In order to mass produce test-tube burgers, the cost would have to be cut by using something cheaper than fetal calf serum, which supplies the needed stem cells, called myosatellite cells. There is also the issue of controversy – this meat will not be easy to get into supermarkets.

The idea of lab-meat has been around for a while and has many supporters, including environmentalists and those in favor of animal welfare. There is also talk of the meat helping to end hunger in impoverished nations where meat is hard to come by.

The way livestock is currently grown on farms has proved environmentally unsound due to the production of large quantities of methane (a greenhouse gas) and the significant need for energy and water resources. The meat engineered by Dr. Post will use less energy, land, and water, as well as produce lower levels of greenhouse gases.  The beef also may be healthier, as it is produced without fat.

With the potential to change the world, I say, why not?

Image

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “A New Environmental Delicacy?

  1. As a vegetarian I would not have any problem with invitro meat, provided that no animals are killed in the process. Also in vitro meat might also provide meat for astronauts on long space trips, untill a few years ago NASA had a similar research program. Slaughtering animals in space is impractible.

  2. Pretty Awesome, cloning specific muscle cells brings us closer to space travel than say adding frog dna to the human dna so we can regenerate lost body parts like a frog.

  3. On one hand makes me feel a bit squirgly: on the other, would be good for environmental and ethical reasons. Not so sure that it will help end hunger in impoverished nations: most technological solutions sound good but are too costly or difficult to implement (and the inherent issue causing the hunger, namely huge inequality, still goes unaddressed).

    Still, an interesting development, and better than the cow from Hitch-hikers’ Guide to the Galaxy with its invitation to Arthur to eat parts of its body.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s